Comments on: Adventures in Realtime

By: iPhone Application Review

iPhone Application Review — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:48:00 +0000

I keep reading about how Facebook should go real-time. Isn’t the point of Facebook that it originally replaced the “facebook” printed on college campuses? It’s supposed to be a place to put information, photos, basically a collection of personal homepages. Regardless of how we use it now, it’s core value is information storage, not real-time info streams.

By: Boston SEO

Boston SEO — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:14:41 +0000

Why exactly would Facebook be more afraid of FriendFeed than Twitter? Right now, FriendFeed isn’t that well known…

By: Majsak

Majsak — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:19:04 +0000

Придуманная мной теория чуть-чуть отличается от изложенной автором, кому интересно, могу поделиться своим опытом. Мой емаил:bartelemanymysih@mail.ru, Виталий.

By: iPhone Apps Review

iPhone Apps Review — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:07:45 +0000

My entire life is in realtime. Tweets on my iPhone… and crazy videos, too.

By: emf testing

emf testing — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:55:54 +0000

It’s a wonderfull time, combination of the inevitability of full realtime and everyone joining the conversation via facebook, Twitter and Friendfeed.

By: MegaMillionsTexas

MegaMillionsTexas — Mon, 04 May 2009 15:32:19 +0000

Interesting article, thanks for the reading; good post!.

By: The Great Hashtag Debate of 2009 » odd time signatures

The Great Hashtag Debate of 2009 » odd time signatures — Mon, 04 May 2009 06:40:56 +0000

[...] They consume tweetspace; 2)they’re spam magnets; 3) as tags trend upward, they invite noise. Steve Gillmor sums it up: You can point the conversation at a subject domain via hashtags, or at several users with @replies [...]

By: Renetto

Renetto — Mon, 04 May 2009 06:00:00 +0000

To clarify, the Sorff video is Mr. Renetto’s:)

By: Sarah

Sarah — Mon, 04 May 2009 05:27:32 +0000

To clarify, the “sorff” vid, not Mr. Gillmors.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Mon, 04 May 2009 05:26:17 +0000

Srry, don’t want it. I don’t want EVERYTHING in one place.

I want to see everything happening in different places from one window, ala Seesmic Desktop.

But don’t want it all interconnected. Get the diff? probably not. I have friends in different places because they are different kinds of friends, doing different things and interested in different topics.

And nothing personal, but the vid was a little scary. I suggest a vacation (and maybe a straightjacket).

By: Dave Johnston

Dave Johnston — Mon, 04 May 2009 05:17:59 +0000

If the Realtime Web (Real Time Web? – which one?) means I get the Shel Puppet within four seconds of him doing anything…I’m all in.

By: Renetto

Renetto — Mon, 04 May 2009 03:07:10 +0000

I think you should watch this video about the soon to be released application called Sorff. It’s not exactly what you’re talking about yet… but I can tell you it will be, kind of, in a way, but maybe not… well see soon!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9tD4Yv5pJc

BTW, this post has been Sorffed.

By: Jay Cuthrell

Jay Cuthrell — Mon, 04 May 2009 01:34:37 +0000

If your team could get to Cisco solution centers in your respective cities you could also try this in an HD format. While the prospect of a symmetric 25 Mbps optimized MPLS network (cross carrier?) might seem like overkill, it would in technical terms — rock.

I’m guessing that each of you could maybe push 700 Kbps at your locations no accounting for the jitter and delay for the video you’d be muxing from your homes. If Leo or others with business connectivity can get higher speed, lower hop, and lesser latency — great.

Show us the Buck Rogers approach. Capture it in HD format and push it out… see if people -like- the feel of being in the same room (painted similarly) and then let -one- of the team come in on SD to the mux from their lowly home broadband connection.

Then see who is talking over the other folks. Then see how well the realtime is now becoming another in a series of competitive differentiators for business meeting proxemics.